Sunday 22 July 2012

Micron Associates 10 Smart Ways to Improve Your Budget


Budgeting is a very important part of everyone’s life. For this is about the allocation of wants and well as your needs, your time and your effort on how much you are going to exert to realize such particular task that you are going to work with. But the word budgeting usually comes in the extent of money. Currently, most of the priorities require money; many would say it’s not! But this is a reality check in which we have to face. Though it’s just like a big bang on your head, you don’t have to put a period doing everything. Because Micron Associates believe that in every endeavor there is always an equivalent of ways. Ways on how you are going to make sense on your money.

Decide on your priorities.
Most people’s budgets revolve around three costs: food, housing, and transportation. After you budget for those expenses, which probably account for between half to two-thirds of your take-home pay, and factor in any debt payments, decide how to prioritize savings, household expenses, professional expenses, and entertainment.

Harness the power of a Web tool.
On Mint.com, you can upload your account information and get immediate insight into where your money is going. You can then use that information to start saving more money, just in time for back-to-school season. Other online options include Wesabe.com, Penny minder, and You Need a Budget and the like.

Time yourself.
Once you decide you need to buy a specific item—a new computer, for example, or a backpack—give yourself a specific time limit to make the purchase, such as a half-hour. “You don’t want to lose precious time sifting through options when your instinctive reaction will probably end up being the best decision,” says AnnaMaria Turano, co-author of Stopwatch Marketing: Take Charge of the Time When Your Customer Decides to Buy.

Consider the year, not just the month.
Budgeting for the year is better largely because we feel less confident in our monthly estimates, so add more of a buffer for unexpected expenses, according to research by University of Southern California’s Gulden Ulkumen, Cornell’s Manoj Thomas, and New York University’s Vicki Morwitz.

Set money aside for leisure.
Research shows that people get the most pleasure out of spending on leisure activities, such as vacations, movie theater tickets, and hobbies, partly because these things usually involve spending time with other people. Don’t forget to reserve some cash for such happiness-inducing pleasures.

Consider your high and low points.
A quick review of where you went wrong—and right—over the past few months will help pinpoint your weaknesses. Did you end up spending twice as much as usual on plane tickets because you waited too long to buy them? Or did you buy overly expensive gifts? Don’t just beat yourself up; consider the good decisions you made, too, whether it was comparing prices before buying a new television or cooking more homemade meals.

Take the spending diary challenge.
Write down every single thing you spend money on for two weeks, along with notes on why and how it made you feel. You might be surprised to discover the real leaks in your budget. Instead of lunches out and cab rides, you might be wasting money on coffee and happy hours. After the two weeks is up, review the list and see what jumps out at you.

Avoid temptation.
If you were on a diet, would you stare at chocolate chip cookies all day? Of course not. So why do we torture ourselves by allowing catalogues full of shiny, new kitchen gadgets or tempting electronics to come through our mails slot every day? Cancel them.

Reward yourself.
Diets that force people to expunge almost everything tasty from their meals never seem to have much success. That principle applies to money, too. Denying ourselves every material pleasure turns money into a sad subject, instead of an empowering one. After all, you work hard for your money, so it should bring you some pleasure.

Micron Associates: Bør Romney give mere til onkel Sam?


Præsidentkandidats skatteunddragelse strategi kan være umoralsk, men det er ikke ulovlig.
Mitt Romney, den formodede renkulturer republikanske kandidat, er rigere end de fleste amerikanere kan nogensinde stræber efter at være sammen med en formue anslået på op til $200 millioner. Alligevel har den tidligere guvernør i Massachusetts modstod opfordringer til at forsyne offentligheden med detaljerede oplysninger om hvad han gør med sine penge. Dette Demokrater hævder, viser han skjule noget.
Tidligere på året udgivet Romney sin 2010 skat returnerer og et skøn for 2011, med The New York Times’ redaktionelle side, ord “giver en fuzzy glimt ved en samordnet indsats at parkere meget af hans rigdom i oversøiske afgift nødboliger,.” tyder på et udbredt mønster for skatteunddragelse i modsætning til ethvert tidligere kandidat Romney kunne tilbagevise disse forslag ved at frigive flere år af sin returnerer, som kandidater–herunder hans afdøde far–har gjort i årtier.
Odds er at fortiden Romney skat returnerer ikke behøver nogen rygning kanoner. Det er mere sandsynligt kampagnen er håb om at undgå ubehagelige drøftelser om indkomstmæssige ulighed. Desværre rapporteret Romneys skattemæssige situation ikke er entydigt, Micron Associates.
Internal Revenue Service skøn, at omkring $5 trillioner i aktiver, opbevares på verdensplan i skatteparadiser, som årligt koster onkel Sam til omkring $100 milliarder i indtægter. Romney, udnytter ligesom de fleste rige mennesker, masser af smuthuller, ikke er tilgængelige for de fleste folk. Men i det mindste han betaler skatter. Mere end 10.000 amerikanske husholdninger tjene mere end $200.000 i 2009 betales ingen afgifter overhovedet. U.S. koncerner undgå milliarder mere gennem smuthuller, nogle med navne, der lyder som Elmore Leonard romaner, såsom “Dobbelt irske med en hollandsk Sandwich.”
Selvom tiderne påpeger, at Romney mislykkedes at videregive en $3 millioner schweiziske bankkonto, der er mindre af en big deal end det lyder. IRS kravene til afslørende udenlandske bankkonti er så forvirrende, at agenturet har givet tre amnesti siden 2009 at aktivere skatteydere til at komme i overholdelse. Disse bestræbelser har sammenfattes IRS mere end 4 milliarder dollars.
Men der er et bredere spørgsmål her.
Romney og hans kolleger Republikanerne har gentagne gange fremført, at hæve skatter på “jobskabere” ville skade økonomien. Udgivelsen af flere år af Romneys skat poster ville klart vise, det ikke er rigtigt.
For det første investerer folk generelt ikke udelukkende for at skabe arbejdspladser. Beskæftigelsen er et biprodukt af processen. Husk, at en af de måder, rige er forskellige, er, at de let kan råd til at betale højere skatter. Mange enten betale en lav skatteprocent på en stor procentdel af deres indkomst, fordi det kommer fra udbytte eller betale nogen skatter på alle, fordi deres penge er parkeret i skatteparadiser eller skattefrie investeringer, såsom kommunale obligationer. Hvis skatter skæres ned på de rige, løbe flere penge ind i deres bankkonti. Eftersom der virksomheder lært at gøre mere med mindre som økonomien tanked, det er højst usandsynligt, at en betydelig mængde af penge vil sive ned meget yderligere.